Check out the episode:

You can find the shownotes through this link.

---

Are you interested in public-private partnerships for improved urban futures?

---

Our summary today works with the article titled Critical success factors for public-private partnerships in urban regeneration projects from 2024 by Paula Vale de Paula, Rui Cunha Marques, and Jorge Manuel Goncalves, published in the MDPI Infrastructures journal.

This is a great preparation to our next interview with Sally Capp in episode 296 talking about the importance of the public-private partnership endeavours for urban futures.

Since we are investigating the future of cities, I thought it would be interesting to see how can this structure enhance regenerative development. This article investigates the critical success factors for public-private partnerships for urban regeneration projects.

[intro music]

---

Welcome to today’s What is The Future For Cities podcast and its Research episode; my name is Fanni, and today I will introduce a research paper by summarising it. The episode really is just a short summary of the original paper, and, in case it is interesting enough, I would encourage everyone to check out the whole paper. This is also an experiment as I produced and generated the summary part with Notebook LM as two hosts dissecting the whole report.

---

[music]

Speaker 1: So you wanted to know more about how public private partnerships are really working out in urban regeneration? We did a deep dive into a recent research paper just for you guys. It’s called Critical Success Factors for Public Private Partnerships in Urban Regeneration Projects.

Speaker 2: Nice.

Speaker 1: It lays out a whole framework for what makes these partnerships actually work, but also dives into some of the controversies swirling around them.

Speaker 2: I can imagine.

Speaker 1: We’re talking gentrification, conflicts of interest, even how these partnerships can be tied to some pretty big political ideas that are reshaping our cities.

Speaker 2: Yeah. It’s a really timely topic. And this paper does a great job of breaking down some really complex issues.

Speaker 1: For sure. So first things first, let’s make sure we’re all on the same page. What should we talk about? Public private partnerships, or PPPs for short. What exactly are we talking about?

Speaker 2: Essentially, it’s when a public entity, say a city government, teams up with a private company for the long haul to deliver a public service or build some kind of important infrastructure.

Speaker 1: So instead of the government going it alone to, say, revamp a neglected neighborhood, they bring in a private company to share the load and the risk.

Speaker 2: Exactly. And this isn’t some brand new idea, either. The paper points out this trend has been gaining momentum since the 1990s. Wow. Especially in places like Europe, the UK, China, and the US. Okay. It’s seen as a way to tackle these huge urban challenges. That can be really tough for governments to handle all on their own.

Speaker 1: I can imagine. But I’ve also heard some pretty strong criticism of PPPs.

Speaker 2: Mm hmm.

Speaker 1: People worry about things like gentrification where long term residents get pushed out.

Speaker 2: Yeah.

Speaker 1: Or whether these projects really serve the community or just end up benefiting big corporations.

Speaker 2: You’re hitting on a crucial point there, and it’s something the paper addresses head on. There’s a lot of debate around how PPPs fit into the bigger picture of how our cities are changing. Some critics tie them to what’s called neoliberal urbanism, which emphasizes private sector solutions and market forces, even for things that are traditionally considered public goods. This raises concerns about who’s really calling the shots and who ultimately benefits from these

Speaker 1: projects.

So it sounds like PPPs are a bit of a double edged sword. They have the potential to do a lot of good, but there are also some serious risks involved.

Speaker 2: And that’s why this paper is so important. Yeah. It tries to pinpoint those critical success factors or CSFs.

Speaker 1: Okay.

Speaker 2: That can make or break these Urban Regeneration Partnerships.

Speaker 1: Okay, break that down for me. Sure. What exactly are these CSS?

Speaker 2: Think of them as the essential ingredients for success.

Speaker 1: Okay.

Speaker 2: They’re the conditions or actions that really determine whether a project achieves its goals. And the researchers behind this paper have grouped them into two main categories. External factors, which are all about setting the stage for success before the PPP even kicks off. Got it. And internal factors which focus on how the partnership itself is structured and managed.

Speaker 1: So it’s not just about signing a contract and crossing your fingers. There’s a whole lot of prep work involved, both in terms of the broader context and the partnership itself.

Speaker 2: Let’s start with those external factors. The paper highlights that sometimes, even with the best intentions, a PPP just won’t succeed because the environment isn’t right. Imagine trying to launch a major waterfront redevelopment project in a city with a history of political instability and corruption. Investors are going to be understandably nervous. Makes sense. That’s why one of the first things the paper points to is the need for a stable political climate and a reliable legal framework. Okay. It’s about creating a level playing field where everyone knows the rules of the game and feels confident that agreements will be honored.

Speaker 1: That makes sense. It’s like trying to build a house on shaky ground.

Speaker 2: Yeah,

Speaker 1: if the foundation isn’t solid, the whole thing could come crashing down.

Speaker 2: Absolutely. And hand in hand with that legal framework, there needs to be strong government support, and we’re not just talking lip service here, right? It’s about concrete actions like providing guarantees to reduce risk for private investors, or having a dedicated public agency that really knows its stuff and can provide the necessary expertise.

Speaker 1: It’s about. Showing that the public sector is a reliable and committed partner, not just someone looking to outsource a problem

Speaker 2: and that leadership needs to be consistent to think about a project that might take 10 or 20 years to fully unfold. Wow. Yeah, political winds can shift pretty dramatically over that kind of time frame for sure. If investors sense. There’s going to be a lot of uncertainty or flip flopping on policy. They’re going to be a lot less likely to jump on board.

Speaker 1: Yeah. I’m starting to see how important it is to create a sense of trust and stability from the get go. It’s about sending a clear signal that this partnership is in it for the long haul.

Speaker 2: Exactly. But it’s not just about the government side of the equation.

Speaker 1: Okay.

Speaker 2: The paper also emphasizes the need for a healthy financial and capital market. Private companies need access to funding to make these projects happen. Yeah. And if those markets are shaky or unpredictable, it can throw a real wrench in the works.

Speaker 1: We’ve all seen how a sudden economic downturn can put a halt to even the most promising initiatives.

Speaker 2: Exactly. And speaking of potential roadblocks.

Speaker 1: Okay.

Speaker 2: The paper also brings up the importance of community support. If residents feel like they’re being left out of the process or worse, that they’re going to be displaced by this fancy new development. Right. They can become a powerful force of opposition. Yeah. We’ve seen products get delayed or even completely derailed because of community pushback.

Speaker 1: And that’s where those concerns about gentrification come into play. Right? Yeah. It’s not just about building shiny new buildings. Right. Right. It’s about making sure those improvements actually benefit the people who live there.

Speaker 2: Absolutely. There’s this real tension between attracting investment. And making sure that investment doesn’t end up displacing the very people the project is supposed to be helping. I see. And of course the broader economic context matters a lot too. Yeah. It’s a lot easier to get a PPP off the ground in a city with a thriving economy and a stable economy. Stable macroeconomic environment. Trying to launch a major regeneration project in the middle of a recession is going to be an uphill battle to say the least.

Speaker 1: So we’ve got these big picture external factors that need to be in place for a PPP to even have a shot at success. What about the internal factors? Right. The ones that focus on the partnership itself. So where do we even begin?

Speaker 2: The paper breaks it down based on the different stages of a PPP’s life cycle. Okay. It’s like a journey with these crucial checkpoints along the way. Gotcha. Preparation, procurement.

Speaker 1: Okay.

Speaker 2: Each stage has its own set of challenges and potential pitfalls.

Speaker 1: So let’s start with preparation then.

Speaker 2: Okay.

Speaker 1: What are some of the key things that need to happen before a city even starts looking for a private partner?

Speaker 2: This stage is all about laying a solid foundation, getting your ducks in a row before you even think about signing a contract. And one of the most important things, according to the paper, is assembling the right team on the public sector side.

Speaker 1: Make sense.

Speaker 2: You need people who really understand these kinds of projects, legal experts, financial analysts, urban planners, community engagement specialists,

Speaker 1: the whole

Speaker 2: shebang, whole shebang, and they need to be given the resources and authority to actually do their jobs effectively.

Speaker 1: I guess it’s like putting together a special ops team for a high stakes mission. You wouldn’t send in a bunch of rookies to handle something this complex.

Speaker 2: Exactly. And just like any. Good team. They need to be crystal clear on who’s doing what clearly defined roles and responsibilities are essential. Otherwise, you end up with confusion, duplicated effort and potentially even conflicts that can derail the whole project.

Speaker 1: I can see how that could quickly turn into a bureaucratic nightmare.

Speaker 2: Oh, yeah.

Speaker 1: Especially when you’ve got so many different stakeholders involved.

Speaker 2: And remember, we’re not just talking about internal government departments here. You’ve got to think about community groups, businesses. Property owners, all sorts of people who have a stake in what happens in their neighborhood, making sure everyone understands their role in the partnership and how their interests will be represented is crucial from the very beginning.

Speaker 1: Right. It’s about building trust and transparency from the outset. Absolutely. So everyone feels like they’re being heard and that the process is fair.

Speaker 2: Exactly. And speaking of transparency.

Speaker 1: Yeah.

Speaker 2: The paper emphasizes the importance of having a clearly defined project scope. Okay. And thorough documentation. It’s about Yeah. Hammering out the details early on, what are the goals of this project? What’s the timeline? What are the potential risks and challenges? Having everything spelled out in black and white helps avoid misunderstandings and costly disputes down the line.

Speaker 1: So it’s like having a detailed blueprint before you start building a house.

You want to make sure everyone’s working from the same set of instructions. A

Speaker 2: perfect analogy. And before you even get to the blueprint stage.

Speaker 1: Okay.

Speaker 2: The paper stresses the need for a robust feasibility study. Okay. This is where you really dig into the nitty gritty. All right. Is this project actually viable? Does it make sense from a technical standpoint? Can we realistically expect to get the funding we need?

Speaker 1: It’s about. Doing your due diligence, making sure the project actually pencils out on paper before you start pouring time and money into it.

Speaker 2: Exactly. It’s much better to catch potential problems early on than to get halfway through a project and realize it’s not going to work.

Speaker 1: I can

Speaker 2: imagine. And remember all that talk about conflicts of interest and accountability? Yeah. That starts right here in the preparation phase. Okay. Good governance principles need to be baked into the process from the get go. That means making decisions in a transparent way, involving all the relevant stakeholders, and ensuring that the project ultimately serves the public good.

Speaker 1: So preparation is really about building a solid foundation for the partnership, making sure everyone’s on the same page, and that the project has a realistic chance of success.

Speaker 2: Exactly. Now once you’ve done all that groundwork, it’s time to move on to the procurement phase. This is where you actually go out and find a private partner who’s the best fit for the project.

Speaker 1: Okay, so it’s like a matchmaking process. Yeah. Trying to find that perfect match between the public sector’s vision and a private company’s expertise and resources.

Speaker 2: And having a skilled and experienced team on the public sector side is absolutely crucial during this phase. Okay. They need to be able to evaluate. Proposals negotiate effectively and make sure they’re getting a good deal for the city and the community.

Speaker 1: I imagine this stage can be pretty intense.

Speaker 2: Oh, it can be.

Speaker 1: Especially when you’re dealing with large corporations that have their own teams of lawyers and financial analysts. It’s like going up against a heavyweight in a boxing match.

Speaker 2: You’ve got to be prepared to go toe to toe with these companies and make sure you’re not getting steamrolled. For sure. And to ensure that everything’s above board. The paper stresses the importance of a competitive and transparent. parent bidding process. That means setting clear criteria for what you’re looking for in a partner, having a fair and open process for evaluating proposals and keeping the lines of communication open with all potential bidders.

Speaker 1: So it’s about creating a level playing field.

Speaker 2: Yeah.

Speaker 1: Making sure the best proposal wins, not just the one with the most political connections or whatever.

Speaker 2: Transparency and fairness are essential, not just to avoid accusations of favoritism, but also to build trust with the community and potential partners.

Speaker 1: It sounds like building trust is a recurring theme here. You can’t have a successful partnership without it.

Speaker 2: Absolutely. And that brings us to the final stage of the PPP life cycle.

Speaker 1: Okay.

Speaker 2: Contract management. This is where the rubber meets the road, making sure the partnership actually delivers on its promises.

Speaker 1: I imagine this is where things can get really tricky, especially with long term projects that can span decades for sure. How do you make sure that the initial vision and agreements hold up over time, especially when circumstances change and new challenges arise?

Speaker 2: That’s one of the biggest challenges with. PPPs and the paper really emphasizes the need for ongoing commitment and responsibility from both sides. Okay. It’s not enough to just sign a contract and walk away. Both partners need to stay actively involved throughout the life of the project.

Speaker 1: Okay.

Speaker 2: Monitoring progress, communicating regularly.

Speaker 1: Yeah.

Speaker 2: And addressing any issues that come up.

Speaker 1: It sounds like it’s a lot like a marriage. You need to keep working at it to make it succeed.

Speaker 2: Another great analogy. And just like in any long term relationship. Conflicts are inevitable. The paper stresses the need for effective conflict management mechanisms. Yeah. This means having clear procedures for resolving disagreements, open communication, and a willingness to compromise from both sides.

Speaker 1: I guess sweeping problems under the rug is not a recipe for long term success. Not

Speaker 2: at all.

Speaker 1: Yeah.

Speaker 2: It’s much better to address issues head on and find mutually agreeable solutions. For sure. And to keep the partnership on track, effective contract management is crucial. This involves monitoring costs, ensuring quality, and making adjustments to the agreement as needed.

Speaker 1: So it’s about making sure the project stays on budget, meets the agreed upon standard, and can adapt to changing circumstances.

Speaker 2: Exactly. And remember all those stakeholders we talked about earlier?

Speaker 1: Yeah.

Speaker 2: Open and constant communication with all of them is essential throughout the life of the partnership. This means keeping the community informed about Progress addressing their concerns and making sure that the project continues to serve their needs.

Speaker 1: So it’s not just about the public and private sectors talking to each other, right? They need to be constantly engaging with the community as well.

Speaker 2: Absolutely. Transparency, accountability and community engagement. are crucial for building trust and ensuring that the project truly benefits everyone involved.

Speaker 1: Okay. I’m starting to see how all these internal factors fit together. It’s about creating a strong and resilient partnership based on clear expectations, shared responsibility, open communication.

Speaker 2: And a genuine commitment to the

Speaker 1: public good.

Speaker 2: And remember, these internal factors are just as important as those external factors we discussed earlier. You can have the perfect enabling environment, a stable political climate, a healthy economy, but if the partnership itself is poorly structured or managed, the project is likely to fail.

Speaker 1: It’s like having all the right ingredients, but messing up the recipe. Yeah. You won’t get the desired outcome.

Speaker 2: So what does this all mean for you, the listener? What are some of the key takeaways from this deep dive into the world of PPPs and urban regeneration?

Speaker 1: I think one thing is for sure, public private partnerships can be a really powerful tool. Right. For breathing new life into our cities.

Speaker 2: Yeah.

Speaker 1: But they’re definitely not a one size fits all solution.

Speaker 2: Absolutely. It’s not as simple as just throwing money at a problem.

Speaker 1: Right.

Speaker 2: And hoping for the best.

Speaker 1: There’s so many moving parts, both in the bigger picture and within the partnership itself. This paper really highlights just how complex urban regeneration is.

Speaker 2: What’s fascinating here is how this paper reveals the tension between the potential upsides of PPPs and the very real concerns that people have.

Speaker 1: Like those worries about gentrification pushing out longtime residents or the influence of big corporations shaping projects to benefit their bottom line rather than the community’s need.

Speaker 2: And connecting this to the bigger picture, it raises a really crucial question.

Speaker 1: OK, we’ll get to that.

Speaker 2: How can we make sure these urban regeneration projects. Especially the ones involving PPPs are truly serving the community as a whole and not just a select few.

Speaker 1: It’s a question every city needs to grapple with, especially as more and more urban areas are looking to these partnerships as a way to tackle these big challenges.

Speaker 2: And it’s something you can apply to your own city too. Think about the urban regeneration projects happening where you live. Are there areas that could benefit from a PPP? Or are there places where the risks might outweigh the potential rewards?

Speaker 1: That’s such a good point. Maybe there’s a neglected waterfront that could be transformed into a vibrant public space, or an old industrial site that’s ripe for redevelopment into new housing and businesses.

Speaker 2: But before jumping on the PPP bandwagon.

Speaker 1: Right.

Speaker 2: It’s crucial to go back to those external factors we discussed. Okay. Does your city have the legal framework, the financial stability and the community buy in to actually make a PPP work?

Speaker 1: And even if those external factors are in place, it’s critical to think about how the partnership itself will be structured. Who’s going to have a voice in the decision making process? How will conflicts be resolved? How will the project’s impact on the community be measured and addressed? These

Speaker 2: are tough questions.

Speaker 1: Yeah, for sure.

Speaker 2: But they’re absolutely essential to ask if we want to create partnerships that are truly equitable and sustainable.

Speaker 1: Ultimately, the success of any urban regeneration project boils down to a shared commitment to the public good.

Speaker 2: I couldn’t agree more.

---

[music]

What is the future for cities podcast?

---